Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
> On 04/24/2013 10:16 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Otherwise we leave bad containers sitting around and further confuse
> > things on retries.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Mukanyiligira Didacienne <siyana...@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
> > ---
> >  src/lxc/lxc-create.in | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc-create.in b/src/lxc/lxc-create.in
> > index fbb566f..553ffd2 100644
> > --- a/src/lxc/lxc-create.in
> > +++ b/src/lxc/lxc-create.in
> > @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ fi
> >  
> >  if [ ! -r "$lxc_config" ]; then
> >      echo "$(basename $0): '$lxc_config' configuration file not found" >&2
> > -    exit 1
> > +    cleanup
> >  fi
> 
> Isn't this test before the one for already existing containers and so
> would lead to a lxc-destroy of the existing container?

No.  The check for existing container is at line 208.  The check further
down is for the rootfs - which could be an LV.

-serge

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to