On 2013/7/10 22:30, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Qiang Huang (h.huangqi...@huawei.com): >> On 2013/7/10 6:05, Dwight Engen wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Just curious, has there been any thought about doing any more lxc versions >>> 0.9.x before lxc 1.0? Seems like a few things have accumulated since 0.9.0. >>> Just pulled this out of git for perspective: >>> >>> Name Commits Diffstat >>> 0.7.0 140 84 files changed, 4952 insertions(+), 2957 deletions(-) >>> 0.7.1 7 7 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >>> 0.7.2 29 23 files changed, 532 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) >>> 0.7.3 23 17 files changed, 493 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-) >>> 0.7.4 46 32 files changed, 1800 insertions(+), 526 deletions(-) >>> 0.7.5 55 47 files changed, 1764 insertions(+), 1436 deletions(-) >>> 0.8.0 223 97 files changed, 5994 insertions(+), 1300 deletions(-) >>> 0.9.0 366 200 files changed, 17683 insertions(+), 3726 deletions(-) >>> HEAD 194 136 files changed, 10540 insertions(+), 3319 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> I found we tried to change some script to c file, such like lxc-create, but >> it is not accomplished yet, we can't create a container without -t option, > > You misunderstood. We are not getting rid of the templates. We > replaced the lxc-create script with an lxc_create.c program using the > lxccontainer.c API.
Yes, I understand this. > > The lxc_create.c and the api do the actual basic container config > creation and creation of the container rootfs. So lxc_create.c is planing to replace lxc_create.in, we'll delete lxc_create.in in the future, right? > > The templates are simply scripts which fill in the rootfs. Those > *should* remain separate. In fact we probably should be hosting a > repository of customized templates. (That gets a bit touchy - there > are other projects doing the work of creating 'cloud images', and I > don't care to duplicate their work.) > >> are we going to finish it before lxc 1.0? Because it seems like a bug. > > Why? # lxc-create -n test -f config Segmentation fault This used to work. I looked through the code, it didn't handle the situation without -t option. Is this exactly what you want? > > -serge > > . > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
