Am 31.01.2014 um 20:28 schrieb Leonid Isaev <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:26:30 +0100 > Thomas Huber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> [...] >> >> I see your point and thats why I´m asking. >> The Idea was not only to protect the host but also the other running >> service / VMs: > > Right. > >> - KVM with Window2008R2 an MS-SQL running inside >> - a service for Wifi-Managment with multiple accesspoint running inside JVM > > So, the host is also an AP, i.e. there are wireless NICs? No. There several APs connected by LAN. http://www.ubnt.com/unifi > >> - samba >> >> would your start the services just with lxc-execute or setup a complete >> container? > > I'd create a standalone container for each group of services. The idea is to > have a maximally slim host installation and "vanilla" containers which hence > do > not need to be backed up (it is easier to recreate the container than to > recover it). For example, samba and cups can go to one container. That was my first idea and so i though about putting the "router-group" also into a container. Do you think it is necessary to put the kvm-qemu tools also inside e a container? > > The problem which I see with using lxc-execute is that you can't have a > minimal host. Indeed, in the same example of samba, you'll need all its > dependencies installed. that´s a got hint…. thank you! — mirac > > Cheers, > L. > > -- > Leonid Isaev > GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D > Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
