The SUSE is SLES 11 SP3, the latest. Kernel is 3.0XX, but I manged to install kernel 3.14.2, he very latest and greatest. If I could compile LXC latest, I would use it. My client thinks it is great.
I just uploaded the installation logs. This time they responded right away Philip On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Michael H. Warfield <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 13:33 -0400, CDR wrote: >> I am trying to use Fedora 20 and no luck. It does not even install in >> a production box. > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094883 > > That machine in question is significantly larger than my largest server. > His is 512GB RAM while I have only 64GB, he has 80 cores, and I only > have 16. Yeah, OK, I'm a bit jealous but... That's my primary > development engine with about 2 dozen LXC containers running on it > simultaneously of varying distros and running Fedora 20 for the host. > Are you also dying with this "pane is dead" error that he's reporting. > I've never seen that before. > > What are you trying to install it on? Specs - Processor, Cores, Ram, > Disk. > > IAC, that sounds like a Fedora problem, not an LXC problem. What was > the question again? The subject says "Compilation fails under Suse > Enterprise". > > Getting back to the original subject... Given your failure to build on > SLES raises a real questions about what version of SLES is on that > machine and what kernel rev is on it. Sounds like it is not even up to > date with what's been release and if you don't have a decent host (SLES > 11sp3) you're in for no end of migraines from it. > > How about "cat /etc/os-release" and "uname -a" for openers? > > Regards, > Mike > >> Philip > >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Leonid Isaev <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Mon, 5 May 2014 23:07:45 -0400 >> > CDR <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> I was under the impression that the LXC group could make this compile >> >> under every major distribution. >> >> Is there any way somebody from the LXC group can research this with >> >> the Suse guys? They surely >> > >> > Researching this is _your_ task. Here is a hint: >> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2009-01/msg00011.html . >> > >> >> will talk to you people, but not to a customer, unless I pay support >> >> fees. >> >> I imagine I need to install a newer autconf or automake >> >> >> >> rpm -qa | grep auto >> >> automake-1.10.1-4.131.9.1 >> >> autoconf-2.63-1.158 >> > >> > You imagine right. Don't compile git master on an ancient sles: either use >> > a >> > tagged release e.g. 0.x.y, or get a proper distro for the host. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > -- >> > Leonid Isaev >> > GPG fingerprints: DA92 034D B4A8 EC51 7EA6 20DF 9291 EE8A 043C B8C4 >> > C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D > > > -- > Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | [email protected] > /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ > NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all > PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it! > > > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
