No, my container has only one interface, and the host has many cards but only one with an IP address, the rest are UP but are not configured. This scenario males policy routing unnecessary.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Michael H. Warfield <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 08:00 -0400, CDR wrote: >> Does anybody know where in Canonical I may get support for LXC >> bridged-NAT networking? >> If the box is multihomed, it does not work.Although only one of the >> NICs has an IP address, it simply cannot route packets to the network. >> You may ping the default gateway, but that is it. > >> The same happens in every other distribution, but I switched over to >> Ubuntu Server for a host. > > I seem to recall in another message you sent that you were not just > using nat/bridge but also policy routing. Is that still true. If so, > please be sure to mention that along with the bridge networking. You've > got a very unusual setup. > >> Philip > > Regards, > Mike > -- > Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | [email protected] > /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ > NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all > PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it! > > > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
