Yes, 1/3 in Fedora, 1/3 in Centos 7, and 1/3 in Ubuntu 14.04 But that is the server, 100% of my apps are in LXC I need to simplify it, though.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:36 PM, jjs - mainphrame <[email protected]> wrote: > Yikes! you're running critical line of business apps on fedora? > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:35 PM, CDR <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This technology is being used on critical line-of-business >> applications, at least in my company. >> I wish that Stepahane or other would follow a more predictable >> patch-releasing schedule. >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Michael H. Warfield <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 03:23 -0400, CDR wrote: >> >> I did a "git pull" and ´when I issued a "make rpm", it failed >> >> >> >> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: >> >> /usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service >> >> RPM build errors: >> >> File listed twice: >> >> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/_lxc-0.1-py3.3.egg-info >> >> File listed twice: >> >> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/_lxc.cpython-33m.so >> >> File listed twice: >> >> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__init__.py >> >> File listed twice: >> >> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__ >> >> File listed twice: >> >> >> >> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-33.pyc >> >> File listed twice: >> >> >> >> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-33.pyo >> >> File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-autostart-helper >> >> File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-devsetup >> >> File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-user-nic >> >> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: >> >> /usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service >> >> make: *** [rpm] Error 1 >> >> >> >> Any idea how can I compile the software? >> > >> > You raised this issue on 08/09 for 1.1.0alpha1 under Fedora 20. At that >> > time yours was the second report and I was already looking into it. You >> > then raised the issue again on the -devel list on 09/05 for 1.1.0alpha1 >> > under CentOS 7 - exact same issue. At that time the patches had already >> > been submitted on 08/25 to Stéphane and were then under review. I >> > responded to you to that effect on 09/09 along with the reason for the >> > original failure and a pointer to my patches that had been posted to the >> > list. >> > >> > The patches are still being reviewed as he's been exceptionally busy >> > lately and the patches are fairly involved and involved some >> > disagreements in approach which were discussed in private E-Mail between >> > the involved parties. >> > >> > The patches have not been committed to git master to date and he's >> > working on integrating the changes. As a consequence, the answer I gave >> > to you on 09/09 on the -devel list remains the same and is equally >> > applicable to 1.1.0alpha1 and to git master... >> > >> > i.e. ... You can either apply the patches I posted to the -devel list >> > several weeks ago or you can wait for Stéphane to commit the fully >> > integrated patches to git master. At this time, applying my changes >> > will result in some patch warnings due to others submitting some warning >> > changes in parallel patches. >> > >> > I would recommend monitoring the -devel list for further (cough) >> > developments (yes, pun intended). >> > >> > Regards, >> > Mike >> > >> > On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 12:06 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: >> >> This was due to a refactoring of the upstart init network code nearly >> >> a >> >> month ago by someone, AFAIK, not currently on the list which created >> >> some files in an incorrect location and the creation of dependencies >> >> on >> >> it in the systemd code. Patches for this fax paux have been submitted >> >> by me and Stéphane is currently evaluating my patch set to correct the >> >> problems that were created by the earlier submission by another that >> >> inadvertently broke all the rpm based systems. This was reported >> >> several weeks ago and I submitted my fix, after some private >> >> discussion, >> >> on 08/25. >> >> >> >> Please review the following thread, starting on 08/25/2014, on this >> >> list >> >> for the patches and some discussion... >> > >> > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Philip >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> lxc-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | [email protected] >> > /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | >> > http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ >> > NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best >> > of all >> > PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of >> > it! >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > lxc-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users >> _______________________________________________ >> lxc-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
