2014-10-07 13:46 GMT+02:00 Jäkel, Guido <[email protected]>: > Dear Joris, >
Hi, > > >I've compared all configurations, nothing has changed... When I rollback > my host with the last full backup, all goes OK... but > >it's the third time it re appears... > > Sorry, but that's illogical: If it reproducible work with some > backup-image but not with the current one despite of a reboot, there must > be a difference in configuration. And if it's working for a while, it may > be happen without "any (intended) action", but for sure not without any > reason. > Sure it is. But I've compared a lot of configuration files and settings, and I start to loose my brain. I'm sure, like you, there a problem at a moment, I just wanted to know if someone had a similar behaviour before. In parrallel, I continue searching on the broken host. But 3 times, it appeared when I was away from containers and hosts, I don't know how a setting can change without a reason... > > Maybe there's some chaos with interface (re)naming by udev rules? Is the > interface configuration done statically or by DHCP? > > > > BTW: I hate "solutions by counter questions". Therefore, it should not be > a solution but just a question of interest why the physical reach-through > of interfaces is your preferred solution. > Because my hosts are virtuals, and it's very easy to me to provide them 3 interfaces, mounting it by type=phys, and nothing to do more to communicate with my containers (no routing, port forwarding...) Is it such a bad idea ? > > With greetings > > Guido > Thanks for asnwering. Joris _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
