On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Purcareata Bogdan <b43...@freescale.com> wrote: > On 10.02.2015 19:22, Christian Brauner wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> is it currently possible to use macvlan interfaces with unprivileged >> containers? > > > +1 I noticed too that it wasn't possible. This might a limitation of the > user namespace itself, since the lower device you're attaching to is still > in the host / root namespace, and you don't have access to that as a normal > user.
What I often ask, is WHY? Yes, macvlan does not work for unpriv containers. However veth works just fine. And you don't have to put your public link (e.g. eth0) on bridge mode to have a working container with veth network. -- Fajar _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
