Alas, I just ran into this again on a 14.04 system
with lxc 1.1.3-0ubuntu1~ubuntu14.04.1~ppa1
# echo 250 65536 32 32768 > /proc/sys/kernel/sem
bash: /proc/sys/kernel/sem: Read-only file system
# mount | grep proc
proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
proc on /proc/sys/net type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,relatime)
proc on /proc/sys type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,relatime)
...
What's going on there?
- Dan
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Stéphane Graber <stgra...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:53:01PM +0000, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> Hi Stéphane,
>>
>> will commit 773bd28258371ad0058ff946c5cf94419920ffdd be in 1.0.4?
>
> Yes, it's currently in stable-1.0 and so will be included in 1.0.4.
>
>>
>> -serge
>>
>> Quoting Dan Kegel (d...@kegel.com):
>> > I guess this is in your daily ppa builds, but hasn't been released yet,
>> > as I just updated my system from beta trusty to release,
>> > and this bit me again. Will the fix be in ubuntu 14.04.1?
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote:
>> > > The patch you sent seems to let the container set kernel.sem,
>> > > and my build is back to green, thanks.
>> > >
>> > > You should probably ignore the problem in the outer system for now -
>> > > If I run into it again on a clean machine I'll post again.
>> > > - Dan
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >> Quoting Dan Kegel (d...@kegel.com):
>> > >>> This may be a jinxed machine. I installed it from trusty beta 2. I
>> > >>> should probably try again with the released version.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Inside the container:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> /proc/self/attr/current says lxc-container-default (enforce)
>> > >>> There's no line in syslog, and I don't have an audit/audit.log.
>> > >>> strace shows
>> > >>> open("/proc/sys/kernel/sem", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = -1
>> > >>> EACCESS
>> > >>
>> > >> Those make sense,
>> > >>
>> > >>> apt-cache policy apparmor says it's not installed.
>> > >>> Installing it says it won't start inside a container.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> And all this in spite of the container having apparmor off, and being
>> > >>> able to
>> > >>
>> > >> Are you sure? In what way did you turn it off? Because it is
>> > >> definately on.
>> > >>
>> > >>> happily write to it there.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I haven't been able to set that parameter in the container yet today
>> > >>> :-(
>> > >>>
>> > >>> /var/log/upstart/procps.log in the container also shows
>> > >>> sysctl: permission denied on key 'kernel.sem'
>> > >>> (since I put that setting into /etc/sysctl.conf)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> And apparmor_status inside lxc fails with permission denied on
>> > >>> /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/profiles
>> > >>> (which doesn't seem too surprising, but what do I know...)
>> > >>
>> > >> Right, but in the last email you said that you also could not
>> > >> set the sysctl from the host, not inside a container. That's
>> > >> the one that worries me. Can you show the same things for a
>> > >> root shell on the host?
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> lxc-users mailing list
>> > >> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
>> > >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lxc-users mailing list
>> > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
>> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
> --
> Stéphane Graber
> Ubuntu developer
> http://www.ubuntu.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
_______________________________________________
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
