On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:07 AM, P. Lowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why isn't socket activation transparent to the operation of LXD?
>
> Why should LXD care if it was activated by a socket connection or via
> /etc/init.d/lxd? Shouldn't the operation in both cases be the same from
> LXD's (daemon's) point of view?
>
> In one case it's launched like a program, in the other it's launched, except
> a socket connection is then given to it once it starts up, no?

Application-side changes are required to support systemd socket
activation, e.g
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/socket-activation.html

-- 
Fajar
_______________________________________________
lxc-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to