On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 06:16:05AM +0000, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > On Thursday, June 29, 2017 13:30 JST, Stéphane Graber <stgra...@ubuntu.com> > wrote: > > > Hmm, so that just proves that we really more systematic testing of the > > way we handle all that mess in "lxc file push". > > > > For this particular case, my feeling is that LXD 2.5's behavior is > > correct. > > OK, I can see we can restore "2.14 behaviour" with an asterisk, i.e.: > > lxc file push -r /tmp/testdir/* container/tmp > > Which makes "lxc file push -r" in 2.15 behave similar like cp. > > > Before, 2.14 behaved similar like rsync. > > > So can we assume, going forward, the behaviour won't change anymore? :)
Yeah, it should be safe to assume that "lxc file push" will behave like "cp", if it doesn't, we'll consider it a bug and fix :) -- Stéphane Graber Ubuntu developer http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users