You are not alone, it's way more effort than it's worth though. I got it
going once but never again. Best is to bind it from the file system using
the configuration or the profile.



<https://plugin.connect-mobile.co.za>

On 8 February 2018 at 17:35, Daniel Urist <dur...@ucar.edu> wrote:

> Does anybody know whether this is possible or not?
>
> Given the popularity of NFS, I'd think this would be a pretty common use
> case, and looking at the list archives, I'm not the first person to ask
> this.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Daniel Urist <dur...@ucar.edu> wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to create unprivileged containers on NFS volumes? It seems
>> to work fine for a privileged container, but when I try it for an
>> unprivileged container I get the following errors:
>>
>>
>>> Using image from local cache
>>> Unpacking the rootfs
>>> tar: ./var/mail: Cannot change ownership to uid 0, gid 8: Operation not
>>> permitted
>>> tar: ./var/log/wtmp: Cannot change ownership to uid 0, gid 43: Operation
>>> not permitted
>>> tar: ./var/log/lastlog: Cannot change ownership to uid 0, gid 43:
>>> Operation not permitted
>>> tar: ./var/log/dmesg: Cannot change ownership to uid 0, gid 4: Operation
>>> not permitted
>>> tar: ./var/log/btmp: Cannot change ownership to uid 0, gid 43: Operation
>>> not permitted
>>> tar: ./var/log/fsck/checkroot: Cannot change ownership to uid 0, gid 4:
>>> Operation not permitted
>>> tar: ./var/log/fsck/checkfs: Cannot change ownership to uid 0, gid 4:
>>> Operation not permitted
>>> tar: ./var/log/apt/term.log: Cannot change ownership to uid 0, gid 4:
>>> Operation not permitted
>>> tar: ./var/local: Cannot change ownership to uid 0, gid 50: Operation
>>> not permitted
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
_______________________________________________
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to