On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:15 PM Harald Dunkel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/25/19 4:52 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > > > > snapcraft.io <http://snapcraft.io/> is also owned by Canonical. > > > > By using lxd snap, they can easly have lxd running on any distro that > already support snaps, without having to maintain separate packages. > > > > The problem is that there is no standard for all "major" distros, > as this discussion shows: > > https://www.reddit.com/r/redhat/comments/9lbm0c/snapd_for_rhel/ > > You mean "RHEL doesn't have snapd"? You'd have to ask redhat then. > Debian already has an excellent packaging scheme. Sure. The question now is "is anybody willing to maintain debian lxd packages" > The RPM world > doesn't follow snapd, as it seems. Really? https://docs.snapcraft.io/installing-snap-on-fedora/6755 > And if you prefer your favorite > tool inside a container you can find docker images everywhere. > > A few years ago compatibility was achieved on source code level. > Sorry to say, but you lost that for lxd. And snaps are not a > replacement. > > In the past I've built private RPMs for lxd on centos. It became a hassle though as (for example) I need to port additional packages as well. And I needed to change the kernel to a newer one, unsupported by centos. But it works. So if you're willing to build from source, it should still work. -- Fajar
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
