On 08/31/2010 12:23 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr): > >> On 08/30/2010 02:36 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> >>> Quoting Papp Tamás (tom...@martos.bme.hu): >>> >>>> Daniel Lezcano wrote, On 2010. 08. 30. 13:08: >>>> >>>>> Usually, there is a mechanism used in lxc to kill -9 the process 1 of >>>>> the container (which wipes out all the processes of the containers) >>>>> when lxc-start dies. >>>>> >>>> It should wipe out them, but in my case it was unsuccessfull, even if I >>>> killed the init process by hand. >>>> >>>> >>>>> So if you still have the processes running inside the container but >>>>> lxc-start is dead, then: >>>>> * you are using a 2.6.32 kernel which is buggy (this mechanism is >>>>> broken). >>>>> >>>> Ubuntu 10.04, so it's exactly the point, the kernel is 2.6.32 . >>>> >>>> >>>> Could you point me (or the Ubuntu guy in the list) to an URL, which >>>> describes the problem or maybe to the kernel patch. If it's possible, >>>> maybe the Ubuntu kernel maintainers would fix the official Ubuntu kernel. >>>> >>> Daniel, >>> >>> which patch are you talking about? (presumably a patch against >>> zap_pid_ns_processes()?) If it's keeping containers from properly >>> shutting down, we may be able to SRU a small enough patch, but if >>> it involves a whole Oleg rewrite then maybe not :) >>> >> I am referring to these ones: >> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=13aa9a6b0f2371d2ce0de57c2ede62ab7a787157 >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=dd34200adc01c5217ef09b55905b5c2312d65535 >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=dd34200adc01c5217ef09b55905b5c2312d65535 >> > (note, second and third are identical - did you mean to paste 2 or 3 links? >
3 links, was this one. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=614c517d7c00af1b26ded20646b329397d6f51a1 >> Are they small enough for a SRU ? >> > The first one looks trivial enough. I'd be afraid the second one would be > considered to have deep and subtle regression potential. But, we can > always try. I'm not on the kernel team so am not likely to have any say > on it myself :) > Shall we ask directly to the kernel-team@ mailing list ? Or do we have to do a SRU first ? Thanks -- Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
