On 09/17/2010 05:06 PM, Sebastien Pahl wrote: > I hope so too:-) > > Daniel do you have any news about this?
Yes, I had a private discussion last week with Eric Bierderman, and he said he will send the patches for upstream at the end of this week or next week if he has time and enough bandwidth to support a proper review. > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 16:52, Scott Bronson<bron...@rinspin.com> wrote: >> Thanks Sebastian, that makes perfect sense. Looks like the proc namespace >> patches didn't make 2.6.36 either (-rc4 is current). Fingers crossed for >> 2.6.37...? >> >> On Sep 17, 2010 12:28 AM, "Sebastien Pahl"<s...@dotcloud.com> wrote: >>> >>> You need a patched kernel for that to work. >>> >>> Have a look at: http://lxc.sourceforge.net/patches/linux/ >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 08:54, Scott Bronson<bron...@rinspin.com> wrote: >>>> When I call lxc-attach,... >>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances >>>> and start using them to simplify application deployment and >>>> accelerate your shift to cloud computing. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Lxc-users mailing list >>>> Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sebastien Pahl >>> @sebp >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
