On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@free.fr> wrote:
>
> Maybe it would be easier to check first if you have this fd in bash with ls
> -al /proc/<pid>/fd and then follow up the hierarchy to find the first
> process who introduced this fd.
So, tracing the two open fds as you suggested
lxc-start: inherited fd 7 on pipe:[5329]
lxc-start: inherited fd 9 on pipe:[5333]
in the following tree
init─┬─acpid
├─console-kit-dae───63*[{console-kit-da}]
├─cron
├─2*[dbus-daemon]
├─dbus-launch
├─dhclient
├─gdm───gdm─┬─Xorg
│ └─fluxbox─┬─ssh-agent
│ ├─urxvt───bash───su───bash
│ └─xterm───bash───su───bash───pstree
revealed they are both open starting with the second gdm process
down to the leaf bash processes.
The first gdm process had only fd 7 on pipe:[5329] open and finally
init had none of these pipes.
As you can see, I have exchanged xmonad for fluxbox and in
addition to urxvt I tried xterm without any change.
To send the bugreport to a proper place, which process should be
responsible for closing those fds? gdm?
Thanks,
Frank
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
