On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Andy Billington <a...@andybillington.com> wrote: > In terms of what I was doing to destroy the file system, I think I can > summarise it for you. No running containers, no open files on filesystem and > no processes even looking at it apart from mount. Run a du -h against it to > check something, crash. > > Btrfs-tools says 0.19 as that's what came in from the apt-get. Maybe newer > btrfs versions may work better, but until they "qualify" for an apt-get in > Ubuntu LTS, they aren't options. ZFS on the other hand has been rock solid > in testing in this and other scenarios for two years, so the problems I've > had are not LXC related, they are btrfs problems with the current LTS > version of btrfs. Maybe someone can get look at getting that upgraded, if > there is a stable release? But, as I said, digressing ....
ah, right, i forget that i use Archlinux for everything (i'm not a host :-), so i'm always running the brandest new spankiest kernels, and i build the btrfs tools from git into a native Arch package. but yes, i would not recommend using it on .32, was only declared ready for [very] early adopters at that point :-D C Anthony ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
