Hello All,
As planned I got 10GbE interfaces(with linux TOE) on my server(long
wait...!!) and got two debian containers up with following configuration:
>Set macvlan on the 10GbE physical interface
* sudo ip link add link eth0 address 00:00:00:ab:00:01 macvlan0 type
macvlan mode bridge*
> Setup containers with macvlan
* lxc.network.type = macvlan
lxc.network.macvlan.mode = bridge
lxc.network.link = eth0*
The containers can ping eachother but the problem is they are no way
near the 10gig mark (throughput IPERF < 1Mbps). Am I missing any
configuration here? my goal is to bridge the containers @ 10gig using
macvlan. The veth bridging yields 2.8Gbps ,with MTU tweak, but thats
the maximum I can get to. Need your expertise on pushing the rates !
Thanks & Regards
Mayur
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 03/14/2011 05:23 PM, Mayur Gowda wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>> I plan to use a 10GbE network interface on a PC
>> running ubuntu and want to pump traffic between 2 LXC containers close to
>> 10gig. Previous old posts indicate that bridging between containers with
>> VETH for 10GbE has limited performance and higher loss, is it true???
>> Mac-vlan has better performance at 10gig but how do I use to communicate
>> between multiple containers??
>>
>
> Hi Mayur,
>
> I think you can try with macvlan, yes.
> Make sure in your configuration you specify lxc.network.macvlan.mode =
> bridge for both containers.
>
> Let us know about the results
>
> Thanks
> -- Daniel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
