Le 09/08/2011 17:44, Rob Landley a écrit : > On 08/09/2011 08:27 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 03:10:44PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> On 08/09/2011 10:03 AM, Jeremy MAURO wrote: >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> Any updates about this request, because I am unable to setup a nfs >>>> server on the container without a nfs-server on the main server. >>>> Once the nfs-kernel-server is setup on the main server, I am still >>>> unable to mount the nfs exports: >>>> On the main server: >>>> [root@server]:/var/lib/lxc/nfsroot/rootfs/var/lib # showmount -e localhost >>>> Export list for localhost: >>>> [root@server]:/var/lib/lxc/nfsroot/rootfs/var/lib # >>>> >>>> On the container: >>>> [root@nfsroot]:~ # showmount -e localhost >>>> Export list for localhost: >>>> /var/nfsroot 10.10.0.0/16 >>>> [root@nfsroot]:~ # showmount -e 10.10.200.31 >>>> Export list for 10.10.200.31: >>>> /var/nfsroot 10.10.0.0/16 >>>> >>>> And when trying to mount the export, the clients just hangs >>>> [root@client-server]:/ # mount 10.10.200.31:/var/nfsroot /mnt/ >>>> >>>> Any idea? >>> I think the nfs server is not yet supported by the kernel. >>> AFAIR Kirill had a patchset to be merged mainline but I don't know what >>> is the status. >> AFAIK, upstream has no objections on this patchset, but they don't merge >> it. I don't know why. >> >> Anyway, it's only a small part of work which need to be done to get nfs work >> properly in containers. >> >> Rob, do you have any status update? I don't follow nfs maillist currently. >> > P.S. I believe the fies to make cifs and p9 work already went in, and > FUSE already did, but it's been a while and I'll have to retest. (I > know I got 'em all to work, I _think_ all changes necessary to do so > went upstream.) If you're not tied to NFS, you have several options. > > (Getting NFSv4 to work was a crawling horror due to its horrible > overcomplicated design wanting to merge different mount points into the > same superblock without even using the --bind mount mechanism, make > callbacks to kernel threads and userspace with no obvious ownership > rules... NFSv3 was a piece of cake in comparison, and I don't think I > ever got lockd to work properly there either. Of course, other network > filesystems never needed it...) > > Rob > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model > configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and > the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free > download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Lxc-users mailing list > Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users Hello,
does this mean that there is no chance ever to make a nfs4 server working in a lxc container zorg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users