Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
> On 09/30/2011 03:21 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Thanks, Derek, at a first glance this looks pretty neat.  I'll have to
> > try it out (and package it, if noone else does) when I get a bit more time.
> 
> i think it's the wrong approach, at least for those cases where one is
> creating debian based containers on a debian based system. there,
> debconf is so more convenient to be used. which reminds me to finally
> merge in the lxc-debian-with-debconf tempplate into the lxc debian package.

Hi Daniel,

I'm sorry I still haven't sent you the debian->ubuntu delta.  I'm hoping
things will settle down next week.  At this point I'll need to do a new
merge against upstream again (into a ppa, as we'll be in freeze until
end of october), and then anything remaining that is sane I'll send back
to you.

As far as lxc-ubuntu-x, I actually think I'm more likely to start using
openstack locally to quickly create containers, and in the past I've been
happy with lxc-clone on lvm, but this looks flexible for deployments.  I
look forward to seeing your lxc-debian-with-debconf!

thanks,
-serge

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to