Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net): > On 09/30/2011 03:21 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Thanks, Derek, at a first glance this looks pretty neat. I'll have to > > try it out (and package it, if noone else does) when I get a bit more time. > > i think it's the wrong approach, at least for those cases where one is > creating debian based containers on a debian based system. there, > debconf is so more convenient to be used. which reminds me to finally > merge in the lxc-debian-with-debconf tempplate into the lxc debian package.
Hi Daniel, I'm sorry I still haven't sent you the debian->ubuntu delta. I'm hoping things will settle down next week. At this point I'll need to do a new merge against upstream again (into a ppa, as we'll be in freeze until end of october), and then anything remaining that is sane I'll send back to you. As far as lxc-ubuntu-x, I actually think I'm more likely to start using openstack locally to quickly create containers, and in the past I've been happy with lxc-clone on lvm, but this looks flexible for deployments. I look forward to seeing your lxc-debian-with-debconf! thanks, -serge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
