-----Original Message----- From: "Jäkel, Guido" <g.jae...@dnb.de> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 3:59am To: "'Brian K. White'" <br...@aljex.com>, "'lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net'" <lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: ]Re: [Lxc-users] container shutdown
>Executable name: >I would prefer several almost identical actions to be implemented in one >program with options instead of several almost identical programs. So I >say lxc-shutdown -r than lxc-reboot. But I have no problem with >lxc-shutdown doing -r based on argv0 as well as getopts. Everyone can >have what they want without asking you the author to write multiple >programs. ... or -- as it is common use on unix -- with a multi-named (linked) exe containing some "$0-mechanism" ---------------------------------- Isn't that what I said? :) -- bkw ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
