Oh, now I see what you are saying. Yes, i was aware of that. What I'm asking is, without the patch he suggests, does the yum --installroot fail for him altogether, or does he (as I have) end up with a fedora container in which any yum commands require you to add '--releasever=x'.
-serge Quoting rha...@informatiq.org (rha...@informatiq.org): > the releasever is passed as an opt to the script -R > > -- > Sent from my Nokia N9On 5.4.2012 18:25 Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting István Király - LaKing (d...@yahoo.com): > > Hello. > > > > The lxc-fedora template in 0.8.0-rc1 has still a bug, the script aborts, > > due to a missing variable for yum: relreasever. > > > > To fix, edit the file at line 112 > > > > > > YUM="yum --installroot $INSTALL_ROOT -y --nogpgcheck --releasever=$release" > > > > Just mention it, so it can be fixed in the final release. > > > > Greetings, > > István Király > > Thanks, István. Does adding the --releasever make the resulting chroot > know it's releasever, or does the lxc-fedora script fail for you > altogether with out? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to > monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second > resolution app monitoring today. Free. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Lxc-users mailing list > Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
