On 05/14/2012 12:10 PM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: hi,
> Sorry for the useless noise. Easy to be confused about this paramaters. > Ah, right. In that case, perhaps postgresql somehow allocates different > amounts of SHM based on some autodetection mechanism or other > circumstance, and lxc is somehow messing up this mechanism? Yes, that's the point. > I'm just guessing here, perhaps someone with better lxc-fu has some more > useful contribution... :-) Actually I'm curious about other users experience related to psql+lxc. tamas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
