On Mon 2012-10-08 (10:32), Papp Tamas wrote: > On 10/08/2012 09:47 AM, Ulli Horlacher wrote: > > > Are there recommendations on cluster filesystems? > > I have several hosts with fibre channel. They should use a common > > filesystem to have a half-automatic fail-over. > > I think you should be able to use any of the cluster FS (eg. gluster, > moosefs, GFS... etc.)
"should" - I prefer recommendations ny experience :-) I have tried by myself gluster and it is HORRIBLE slow. With GFS I have heard of several fatal crashes with data corruption. > BTW I would rather use just pure volume's from the storage with ext4 and > set MMP (multiple mount protection) on the fs. What is MMP? -- Ullrich Horlacher Informationssysteme und Serverbetrieb Rechenzentrum IZUS/TIK E-Mail: horlac...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de Universitaet Stuttgart Tel: ++49-711-68565868 Allmandring 30a Fax: ++49-711-682357 70550 Stuttgart (Germany) WWW: http://www.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/ REF: <50728fa2.4010...@martos.bme.hu> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
