Hi Serge,
Sorry for my late answer. I do use veth, but the other experiments also use
it. But my guess there is might be some kind of kernel customization, so
they can reach these speeds, but unfortunatelly I am not aware of what
customization they made on their kernels.
A little more about my setup... My kernel's version is:
3.20.0-23-generica-pae.
And the network setup of my containers:
lxc.network.type=veth
lxc.network.link=lxcbr0
lxc.network.flags=up
Regards,
Daniel
2012/11/28 Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@canonical.com>
> Quoting daniel marques (daniel.marq...@uniriotec.br):
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Recently I've adopted LXC as a network virtualization tool, where I use
> the
> > containers to generate traffic via iperf and do my experiments. So far,
> > everything seems to be fine, but I am with doubts regarding the network
> > namespace used in the containers, using it without customizing anything
> > I've managed to generate up to 100Mbps of throughput, but no more than
> > this. I'd like to know what can I do to have a better performance with
> > these interfaces, since I've found out that using the network namespace I
> > can reach up to 1Gbps.
> > This is the my setup:
> > Ubuntu 12.04 32 bits
> > LXC 0.7.5 (installed from Ubuntu's repository)
>
> There shouldn't be a difference between lxc and network namespaces...
> When you say you reach 1Gbps with network namespaces, how are those
> set up? Are they using veth? How about your lxc setup?
>
> -serge
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
TUNE You got it built. Now make it sing. Tune shows you how.
http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
