On Saturday 5 January 2013 at 02:19, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> > I've come back around to looking at simply attaching all containers to
> > lxcbr0. I don't think anything I want to run would have an issue with NAT. I
> > would then port forward connections to the public IP for web onto the nginx
> > container and so on for other services. The nginx container would proxy to
> > the various apache container instances - as they're all connected to lxcbr0
> > i'm assuming from what I've read that's as straightforward as a regular LAN.
> >
> Basically use whatever works for you.
>
> I like bridging the real intnerface more, but NAT should work as well.
> Instead of using lxcbr0 though (which comes with dnsmasq by default),
> I'd create my own bridge:
> http://wiki.1tux.org/wiki/Ubuntu/Bridge#Bridge_with_IP_address
>
Thanks very much Fajar, appreciate your help and pointers. I'm going to go with
a NAT arrangement at this time as it sits best with me at the moment as far as
my current understanding goes.
Thanks,
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
