On 02/22/2013 09:57 AM, Papp Tamas wrote: > On 02/22/2013 03:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: >> >> >> Why not? > > Why would I do that? > It would just make myself confused. > > I don't see any reason to do that. > > tamas
The biggest reason for the lxcpath feature is the introduction of user namespaces. Once every user will be able to just run lxc containers, you don't want them to have to check what container names the others are using to avoid clashing with them. It'd have been confusing to restrict system containers but not user containers, so the change works for all of them. I expect most people won't have identically named containers running as the same user from two different paths, but if they do, it'll still work. -- Stéphane Graber Ubuntu developer http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
