Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > On 04/25/2013 02:18 PM, Hans Feldt wrote: > > Thanks great! But what I don't (yet) understand is shouldn't the new %P > > behaviour be the default of %p instead? > > > > I mean a container PID never makes sense in host user space since there > > is a 1:n mapping. Meaning PID x can have n mappings on the host. > > > > Thanks, > > Hans > > Well, to make apport work we actually need both as we need %P to figure > out what container that's and we need %p to tell apport in that > container what PID to look at. > > So I preferred not to break things by changing the meaning of %p in the > kernel.
Also, %p has meant the container pid for a long time now, so we can't just go and change that in the kernel. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
