On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>wrote:
> Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
> wrote:
> > > Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> > >> Any ideas how to troubleshoot this? Is this something related to
> kernel
> > >> version?
> > >
> > > If the container fails to start at all, then lxc will manually delete
> > > the veth.
> >
> > The case is the container is already running, and then you stop it.
> > Depending on the traffic handled by the container, the veth will
> > sometimes not get deleted.
>
> At all, or for a certain amount of time (like Petru)?
Well, the longest I waited was about 10 minutes, so I don't know what
would've happened if I waited one hour
> I'm wondering
> whether it could just be that there is a socket waiting for a tcp
> timeout, holding the veth open.
>
>
It may be the case.
However, doing "ip link del" on the host side (after the container was
down) always succeded in deleting the veth.
--
Fajar
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT
2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT
3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
