Dear Yao,

as I understand, you want to bound two physical interfaces of the host hardware 
to and use the bound inside a container. 

        eth0--[phys]--eth0--+--bound0
        eth1--[phys]--eth1--/

Because no other -- neither host nor another container -- may use one of NICs 
in addition, I would suggest to put the virtual bounding interface on the host 
and reach through the bound into the container via a veth. To me it's seems to 
be a better separation of concerns.

        eth0--+--bound0--[veth]--eth0
        eth1--/

Following this way, you may also share the bound to more than one container by 
putting a virtual bridge between the virtual bounding interface and the virtual 
Ethernet adapters of the Containers.


By the way, I don't see a clear reason why your current approach may fail. May 
you please present you configuration here?


Greetings

Guido


>-----Original Message-----
>From: wang yao [mailto:yaowang2...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 4:33 AM
>To: lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [Lxc-users] Bonding inside LXC container
>
>Hi all,
>I tried to bond two NICs (eth0 and eth1) in the container, but when I finished 
>the bonding configuration (I think my configuraion is correct)
>and started bonding device inside container, this message came out:
>"Bringing up interface bond0:  bonding device bond0 does not seem to be 
>present, delaying initialization."
>So I want to know if LXC can't support the way of bonding configuration as I 
>did, or I can do something to make this achieved.
>I am glad to talk about "Bonding and LXC" with someone who has interest in it.
>Regards,
>Yao

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps
OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access
Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server.
Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to