BTW, I just checked upower installed on my system.
It seems that the methods remains the same and only the name of
interface and object path were changed. Just replacing DeviceKit-Power
with UPower seems to be enough.

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Marty Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is known that DeviceKit-power would do this when you ask it to Suspend or 
> Hibernate.  Apparently it does not send a reply.  I did not fix it because it 
> is difficult for me to test the power stuff, it is only a warning, and the 
> DeviceKit support is not production quality and not meant to be enabled in a 
> released product.  I would have fixed everything up properly when we finish 
> up the UPower support.
>
> If it is something else, I am receptive to a bug report.
>
> I do have a checkin ready to go that removes the wait for the reply and the 
> warning, but I can't test it very well on this system.
>
> On 03/08/2010 10:58 AM, PCMan wrote:
>> try do do "env | grep DBUS" and give us the output.
>> Maybe dbus is not running correctly.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Andrea Florio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> running lxsession-logout i receive that:
>>>
>>> ** (lxsession-logout:2513): WARNING **: dbus-interface.c:71: DBUS: Did
>>> not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did
>>> not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the
>>> reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
>>>
>>> what's wrong here?
>>>
>>> Andrea
>>> --
>>> ------------------------------------------
>>> Andrea Florio
>>> QSI International School of Brindisi Sys Admin
>>> CISCO CCNA Certified
>>> openSUSE-Education Administrator
>>> openSUSE Official Member (anubisg1)
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> Packman Packaging Team
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> Web: http://packman.links2linux.org/
>>> Cell: +39-328-7365667
>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lxde-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lxde-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Lxde-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list

Reply via email to