On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Christoph Wickert <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 18.03.2010, 23:54 +0800 schrieb PCMan: >> Hi list, >> Here comes PCManFM 0.9.3 beta + libfm 0.1.9 beta. > > Thanks a lot for your great work! > > Is it intended that the headers are installed into > /usr/include/libfm/libfm/*.h > rather than > /usr/include/libfm/*.h ? Yes, it's intended. Maybe later we'll have /usr/include/libfm/some-other-sub-project. Who knows? >> Now I declare feature freeze for the first stable release (pcmanfm 1.0 >> and libfm 0,2). > > Hmm, I think dragging files to the sidepane should be supported. If not, > the cursor should clearly indicate this and pcmanfm must not crash if > one tries to drag files there. Ooooops, that one was planned and I forgot to fix it. OK, let's make an exception here. I'll try to make it work. If I failed, I'll try to make it disabled before final release. >> Translators please exams the strings in both libfm and pcmanfm. > > Talking about stings: pcmanfm2.desktop should have > Name=PCMan File Manager > instead of just > Name=File Manager > because people might have more than one file manager installed and it > used to be the same with the old pcmanfm. The name PCMan File Manager is meaningless for users. The users just want their file manager and they should be able to find a menu entry for it. I bet for new users they don't know what's PCMan. In additon, using "Program Name" + "Its Usage" like "PCManFM" + "FIle Manager" in Name key is kind of abuse of desktop entry spec. The name of the program is PCManFM, and "File Manager" should be GenericName. However, Gnome promoted this kind of abuse in their guidelines and this causes some confusion and make things messy. For me, what the program is called doesn't matter. The users should be able to find what they need. File Manager IMO is the most intuitive menu entry title. That's why I did it. For a basic program which is the core of the desktop, branding is not important and a more user-friendly name is needed. > Another question: What is the final going to be called? pcmanfm or > pcmanfm2? Are you planning to make both versions installable in parallel > or is pcmanfm2 going to replace the old version once it's stable? Before stable release, it will be called pcmanfm2 to make the new version and the older one coexist. However, I'll rename it back to pcmanfm before the final stable release when it's ready for daily production use. > Regards, > Christoph > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Lxde-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
