On 12 April 2010 13:37, PCMan <[email protected]> wrote:
> As many of our developers are not professional developers, I'd suggest
> creating some guidelines to help new comers instead of just blaming
> them. Most of us are still learning how to run such a project. So if
> from your experience in your professional career you have some ideas
> to share with us, please do it.
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Marty Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I have re-released LXTask to correct the build failure.
>>
>> I do not intend to make a habit of cleaning up after other people's messes 
>> in the future.  It is totally unacceptable that this happened and that it 
>> was allowed to persist for seven days after being known.  It makes the whole 
>> project look dumb.  If this were my project the responsible developer would 
>> lose file release privileges until having demonstrated that they know how to 
>> do it properly.
>>
>> Another little item that wasn't done is to tag the release.

It seems to me (and I think this has come up on the list before) that
you need to decide on a release policy, document that and appoint a
few people responsible for enforcing that policy.

Cheers,
-- 
Ben de Groot
Gentoo developer

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list

Reply via email to