Hello Klaus, On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Klaus Knopper wrote: > Could "no screenlocking" be the default, please? I think it's rather > intrusive to forcibly lock out the user from his/her session after > waking up from resume, if the user has not explicitly requested this in > the configuration.
I think it is important that the default is "safer". Otherwise the users will hardly think about changing the default and their sessions will be open to anyone who wakes up an unattended computer. It is a way too easy to abuse the physical access if you find yourself at the other user's open session. Illegitimate access to family members' or roommates' computers is not so uncommon, don't let us make it easier. Of course it should be possible to switch off the locking, but only by the user's explicit choice and action. On the other hand the default is probably a "packager's choice" anyway, not so much of the developers? Regards, Rune ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
