On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Tomas Forsman <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012-09-30 22:11, Andrej N. Gritsenko skrev: >> Hello! >> >> Tomas Forsman has written on Sunday, 30 September, at 21:40: >> >>> Anyone knows why libfm requires vala to build now? >>> 1.0 didn't require it, 1.0.1 do. >> >> Even 0.1.99 has required vala to compile. But you can compile 1.0.1 >> without vala, with option --disable-actions, this is the price. >> >> Andriy. >> > > Aha, as im the maintainer of lxde, libfm, pcmanfm in Foresight, I never > needed to add > --disable-actions or used vala as build requires until now. > > That's why im wondering what changed this time to force to use vala as > default in building libfm. > > // Tomas Forsman
Because the newly added custom action support uses vala. However, this only adds some compile-time dependencies. Vala code is compiled to plain C which is again compiled by gcc to binary. So at runtime, it only requires glib and gtk+ just like programs written in C. Cheers! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
