Hi, since I recently worked on the Keyboard Layout Handler it would be not
too much effort for me to port it to the new Qt panel,
just I would like to be sure that the panel will be razor-panel and not
Lxde-Qt, otherwise I would prefer to wait for this decision to be
definitive before starting.
Cheers.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:51 AM, PCMan <pcman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry to bother you guys with the same topic again.
> It's really time-consuming to do the communication stuff, but it's
> inevitable.
> It's better to have some consensus before really starting coding.
> While the razor guys are doing their best pushing razor-qt 0.6 as
> planned, I'd like to start preparing for the merge earlier.
>
> I wrote another wiki page, which is a draft for the merge and hope we
> can coordinate better.
> It also documented what we already have (but the list is not complete).
>
> http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Merge_LXDE-Qt_and_Razor-Qt
>
> Nothing is settled done yet. It's only a draft.
> Some are just my own opinions and I wrote them down for ease of discussion.
> Anything can be changed if anyone has different opinions.
> Feel free to add different opinions either on the wiki page or discuss
> in the ML.
>
> Previously we discussed about using single monolithic repo or
> splitting razor-qt into smaller repos.
> Seems that there are no objections about splitting it into smaller pieces.
> I'd like to know if it's the right time to do it, or we need to wait
> for razor-qt 0.6 release?
>
> We also need to know who is interested in working on which part so we
> won't duplicate the work.
> Regarding to the lxde side:
> I'll work on the file manager part and try to see if I can make a
> obconf qt port (openbox configuration tool).
> About the panel, I'm willing to work on razor-panel instead of my own
> poor lxpanel-qt. After I finish my file manager stuff, I'll see if
> there's anything I can help for razor-panel.
> Andriy is working on libfm and will make a new release soon.
> Julien is working on lxsession now.
> BTW, Julien, would you please document the dbus interface lxsession
> currently provides in the wiki?
>
> Since lxsession is currently more feature-rich than razorqt-session
> and it's a non-GUI program, I'd like to know if we can use lxsession
> and make it adopt current razorqt-session features, including the
> config dialogs.
> Or if there're objections, at least we can make lxsession and
> razorqt-session interchangeable first.
> Comments are really wanted.
>
> Thank you all.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Lxde-list mailing list
> Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
