http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel/8470/focus=11454
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,59149

Looks like they are hard at work on this...


On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:05 AM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Den 29/07/2013 13.28 skrev "Kevin Krammer" <[email protected]>:
>
> >
> > On Monday, 2013-07-29, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > > So how to do it? We would still want to access settings in the code
> through
> > > QSettings, and presumably, when dconf makes it's way into Qt, it will
> be in
> > > the form of a new back-end for QSettings.
> >
> > Very unlikely. QSettings is one of the classes everybody would like to be
> > replaced with something better but for which nobody had time yet.
> >
>
> Are you sure? To me it seemed people disliked the ini- files. Not so much
> QSettings.
>
> Anyway I believe QSettings will stay for the duration of qt5 - at least.
>
> Br. Chr.
>
> > > I've had a (very) cursory look at the dconf-api, and I think this is
> > > possible.
> >
> > Indeed. As far as I understand is uses a mixture of mmap#ing and D-Bus,
> both
> > of which are fully supported by Qt by QFile and QtDBus respectively.
> > Might even be viable as a stop-gap measure to wrap the GObject client
> library
> > until a real Qt implementation can be made for upstreaming into whatever
> will
> > replace QSettings.
> > The dependency and type conversion overheads should be fairly acceptable
> even
> > for something that is used in application startup code.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Kevin
> > --
> > Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
> > KDE user support, developer mentoring
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Razor-qt" group.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/razor-qt?hl=en
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Razor-qt" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list

Reply via email to