That would be ideal =)
J. Leclanche
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Kevin Krammer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2013-08-07, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:00 AM, PCMan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > 3. Should we use dconf-qt, which is done by Canonical instead, or
> > > using our own simple class mimicking QSettings? Personally I prefer
> > > our own solution and this can be included in liblxqt.
> >
> > Seeing as dconf support will ultimately end up in Qt (god knows when,
> > though), I recommend we use our own solution for the time being and
> > eventually switch to the native one.
>
> Not to forget that there is a third option: contribute an implementation
> to Qt
> upstream and then use oficial Qt API.
>
> Cheers,
> Kevin
>
> --
> Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
> KDE user support, developer mentoring
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
