Based on Razor-Qt licensing policies that I read, the author of Razor-Qt
prefer LGPL over GPL.
How the merge of LXDE and Razor-Qt will affect the future of LXDE-Qt? Will
it also prefer LGPL over GPL.
I suggest both developers should consider it earlier before everything get
more complicated.
My opinion is to prefer LGPL over GPL, as it will help wider acceptance for
LXDE-Qt especially from corporate support that may interested with LXDE or
from non-Linux operating system that avoid GPL as possible (e.g. FreeBSD).
Just for information, there are many notable projects which switch their
license from GPL to more relaxed license : LibVLC, GEGL, ApacheOpenOffice,
SDL, PySide, etc.
Source:
https://github.com/Razor-qt/razor-qt/wiki/Licensing-policy
Regards,
RyanBram
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
