@PCMan, That is nice news to hear! Any idea if some of that overhead might be due to extra debugging turned on inside of QT5? Like you I believe Wayland and QT5 should be kept in the loop so to speak. Perhaps keep it on an actively turned on "back burner" to keep simmering along and developing?
This project just keeps getting better, and better. Thank you all, for all of the hard work! On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 9:41 AM, PCMan <pcman...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, I did some more tests today. > Now, PCManFM-Qt compiled against Qt5 can run in Wayland!!! > Known problems: > 1. Qt5 uses significantly more memory regardless of backend used. Both > xcb and wayland platforms uses much more memory than Qt4. > 2. Mouse cursor position and context menu are buggy. > 3. Desktop icon manager does not work. > > Well, I really think that Wayland and its Qt support are still far > from production use. However, in future development we need to keep > Qt5 and wayland in mind so later the porting can be easier. > > Cheers! > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Razor-qt" group. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/razor-qt?hl=en > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Razor-qt" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to razor-qt+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
