Hello!
PCMan has written on Saturday, 10 May, at 14:16:
>On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Andrej N. Gritsenko <and...@rep.kiev.ua>
>wrote:
>Supporting FreeBSD directly is not that difficult.
>Why not do it so the people who maintain ports do not need to patch it?
>Is it a convention that let the ports maintainer patch the packages to
>change the installation paths?
Yes, that is the convention. The packages always install all the data
into standard place. If some OS installs data by own non-standard path
then maintainers handle that themselves. Package should provide a way to
allow such customization though, and that part is done in both menu-cache
and libfm.
>Wouldn't it be better if we can do it?
>I have no objections if you want to revert the changes, though.
Thank you very much.
>> It is a problem with Gettext. Unfortunately I could not find if I can do
>> something with it, all packages that use Gettext just are built using GNU
>> make under FreeBSD and everyone just suggest to use gmake. That is weird
>> enough but it's all we can do unfortunately.
>I don't think we can do anything for fixing this.
>It seems to be the problem of intltool. It seems to use some GNU make
>extensions.
>So, let's document this and clearly state that GNU make is required.
Yes, I've documented that on the Wiki page. Thank you.
Cheers!
Andriy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
