Hi All,
I tried to build LXQt from github source. I ran into build liblxqt fail
after having libqtxdg build and installed. My question is that which part
should I check to get building pass? Thanks.

Here is the description:

* Problem description:
  + cmake complain libxdsettings does not exist

* Error message (parttial):

CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:8 (add_subdirectory):
add_subdirectory given source "libxdsettings" which is not an existing
directory.

CMake Error at lxqt-qtplugin/CMakeLists.txt:15 (find_package):
  By not providing "Findlxqt-qt5.cmake" in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this project
has
  asked CMake to find a package configuration file provided by "lxqt-qt5",
  but CMake did not find one.

  Could not find a package configuration file provided by "lxqt-qt5" with
any
  of the following names:

    lxqt-qt5Config.cmake
    lxqt-qt5-config.cmake

  Add the installation prefix of "lxqt-qt5" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
  "lxqt-qt5_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files.  If
  "lxqt-qt5" provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it has
  been installed.


* Build command:
  + mkdir build && cd build && cmake ../ -DUSE_QT5=ON
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr

* Build environment:
  + Debian Sid
  + Qt 5.3.1
  + cmake 3.0.2

* Done tests:
  + Remove add_subdirectory(libxdsettings) in mater cmake project file
(CMakeList)
     - Result: The first error gone, but second error still exists.

By the way, the document Build LXDE-Qt From Source
<http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Build_LXDE-Qt_From_Source> does not have liblxqt
included.

Best regards,
Wen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list

Reply via email to