Yep, connman would be an alternative, but will goes against Fedora and RedHat defaults, and meaning we would double the maintenance effort, so we loose all the benefits of a large tested software, even in security matters.
I would go with connman just if was really last option, let's try the NetworkManager qt only first, as we are all developers, right :-) On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Helio Chissini de Castro < heliocas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yep, connman would be an alternative, but will goes against Fedora and > RedHat defaults, and meaning we would double the maintenance effort, so we > loose all the benefits of a large tested software, even in security > matters. > > I would go with connman just if was really last option, let's try the > NetworkManager qt only first, as we are all developers, right :-) > > > On Mon Nov 03 2014 at 5:11:10 PM Eugene Pivnev <ti.eug...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 03.11.2014 21:37, Helio Chissini de Castro: >> > >> > - We still not have a solution for a proper NetworkManager solution. I >> > will talk later to the NetworkManager KDE maintainer to see how >> > feasible would be a Qt only version, to avoid drag more dependss >> What about connman and qt GUI for it? >> Yes, I know that they (GUI) are too dumb now. >> But... They are light. >> PS. I'm trying to work with qconnman+qconnman-ui and cmst. Not usable >> yet (concerning wifi), but... >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Lxde-list mailing list >> Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list >> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
