Thanks Bob, that’s much clearer
Rather than the current error message of
Element 'ProcessingStatusValue': [facet 'enumeration'] The value 'Processing
complete' is not an element of the set {'Ready for English peer review', 'Ready
for English scientific review', 'Ready for English OCCM review', 'Ready for
Spanish peer review', 'Ready for Spanish OCCM review', 'Ready for publishing',
'Ready for translation', 'Processing complete'}.
You would rather see
Element 'ProcessingStatusValue': [facet 'enumeration'] The value 'Processing
complete' is not an element of the set {'Ready for English peer review',
'Ready for English scientific review', 'Ready for English OCCM review', 'Ready
for Spanish peer review', 'Ready for Spanish OCCM review', 'Ready for
publishing', 'Ready for translation', 'Processing complete'}.
for example.
I know where this error message is being generated in libxml2 (in
xmlschemas.c). If you could send a small XML instance and schema that fails, I
can run the debugger against XMLint to understand the logic leading to this.
It is probably an error in libxml2 rather than in in the lxml python bindings.
Cheers
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Kline <bkl...@rksystems.com>
Sent: 02 May 2021 17:57
To: Paul Higgs <paul_hi...@hotmail.com>
Cc: lxml mailing list <l...@lxml.de>
Subject: Re: [lxml] Tested value modified in validation error message
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 10:37 AM Paul Higgs <paul_hi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> If the input is "Processing\ncomplete" and the match string is "Processing
> complete" then this will not be a match, but if your enumeration value is
> "Pattern\scomplete" it should be OK (and it will also match "Pattern
> complete"(.
> (I guess the "sometimes garbles whitespace inside text nodes" is just the
> commercial XML editor wrapping lines that could exceed a 'pretty' length.
Hi, Paul.
We're dealing with two bugs. The first bug is the behavior of the editor
vendor's implementation of the DOM API, which is giving us back corrupted XML
when we ask for the serialized document via the Document object's xml property.
We know that it's the implementation of the serialization for that property
which is introducing the corruption, rather than corruption of the values in
the DOM itself, because when we recursively walk through all the nodes of the
DOM to implement our own serialization of the document, the corruption is not
present, and the whitespace inside all of the text nodes is intact. We have
reported that problem to the editor vendor, and I have implemented a workaround
to avoid this first bug.
The bug I'm asking about in this forum is the second bug, which is producing an
incorrect error message, pretending that the value being submitted for testing
was "Processing complete" (without a newline
character) when the value being tested was actually "Processing\ncomplete"
(with a newline character). The confusion this misleading error message
introduced made it much more difficult than it should have been to track down
and identify the first bug.
Does that make things clearer?
--
Bob Kline
https://www.rksystems.com
mailto:bkl...@rksystems.com
_______________________________________________
lxml - The Python XML Toolkit mailing list -- lxml@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lxml-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/lxml.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
