Hi Stefan, sorry for the long delay. That makes sense - although what about somebody using e.g. PyPy? That one is licensed under MIT and not PSF license.
Anyway, I don't think this is a big deal - I just noticed it and thought I should mention it for completeness' sake. Thanks and best regards, Jakub On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 5:59 PM Stefan Behnel via lxml - The Python XML Toolkit <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Jakub Kulik via lxml - The Python XML Toolkit schrieb am 14.05.26 um 12:10: > > The latest version of lxml introduced _difflib.py, which is taken (as the > > comment on the top suggests) from Python 3.14 sources. The file mentions > no > > licensing information, thus appearing BSD Licensed like the rest of lxml > > sources, but since it's from Python, I presume it should be PSF licensed? > > Should the PSF License be mentioned in e.g. LICENSES.txt? > Right, I'll add a note. Thanks for mentioning it. > > Obviously, users of Python cannot practically object to the terms of the > PSF-License, so this is mostly cosmetics for completeness… > > Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > lxml - The Python XML Toolkit mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/lxml.python.org > Member address: [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ lxml - The Python XML Toolkit mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/lxml.python.org Member address: [email protected]
