David Woolley dixit: >XHTML is a clean start and certainly isn't intended to be backwards >compatible.
It is. XHTML/1.0 and HTML/4.02(iirc) are the same spec, just one with XML constraints added. The proposed XHTML/2 is a joke, but XHTML/1.1 is HTML/5. >XHTML 1.1 isn't backwards compatible, because there >are no compatibility hacks Enough to please most browsers. >and text/html can't be used as the >media type. It can, see my other eMail. bye, //mirabile _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list Lynx-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
