050205 Chuck Martin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:28:46AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> the problem is that Lynx follows links sequentially, >> whereas Firefox etc do it simultaneously, >> so that if one of the links you want to grab is a bit slow, >> the others are not delayed nor is your general reading rhythm. > If you use screen in the way that I described in my previous response > in the other thread, they will be downloaded simultaneously > by the separate Lynx sessions in each screen window. > Do you still think Lynx needs this capability?
yes, i appreciate your detailed reply & will store it in my archives, but it's far too complicated to expect an ordinary user to employ. also, i would have to install Screen on my system, adding to bloat there. and can you in fact have > 1 instance of Screen running simultaneously ? i suspect that what i propose for Lynx would be feasible & not difficult, so i still advocate it, if anyone has the time & interest to do the coding. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
