Thomas Dickey dixit: > I'd like to do 2-3 more patches before 2.8.6. I'm halfway through one > patch, but more urgent things pushed lynx down the stack (ncurses, xterm > vile and cdk have gotten attention, lynx, dialog and bcpp haven't).
cdk? Hmm, interesting (that one shows up in MirOS too ;) I'm busy with all things at once too (base, security fixes, XFree86, c++, ports...) so I know how you must feel... > ftp://dickey.his.com/temp/lynx2.8.6dev.11h.patch.gz Okay, I'll have a look and take that as base, thanks! > But you're not asking about a development snapshot, but a release, No, I'm going with development snapshots. Of all projects, OpenBSD and Lynx are the only ones with development snapshots more stable than releases of _all_ other software I've ever seen. XFree86 is good too, though, and I'm currently playing with binutils-mainline. > I don't expect it to change - Markus Kuhn implemented it, and building > up tables like that isn't something I like to do. His latest version > is dated 2003-05-20, and barring bug-fixes, I probably won't change it. kay, thanks. //mirabile -- > [...] Echtzeit hat weniger mit "Speed"[...] zu tun, sondern damit, da� der > richtige Proze� voraussagbar rechtzeitig sein Zeitscheibchen bekommt. Wir haben uns[...] geeinigt, dass das verwendete Echtzeit-Betriebssystem[...] weil selbst einfachste Operationen *echt* *Zeit* brauchen. (aus d.a.s.r) _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
