Tomas Liska dixit: > I would like to report the issue, which I met just a few seconds ago. I > downloaded a file, which has 4GB in size. The lynx is reporting the bad total > size while downloading. It reports only 2GB. Although it reports a bad file > size value, the file has been downloaded correctly. So I assume it is not an > issue of functionality, but it is a case of comfort of the UI.
I suggest checking the server response too. For example, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ openssl s_client -connect blah:443 -quiet -CApath /etc/ssl/certs HEAD /blah.iso HTTP/1.0 Host: blah HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:13:26 GMT Server: httpd/3.30A (Unix) Last-Modified: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:16:02 GMT ETag: "80db1dfd13cbc3130d75f4d8e362b3a1639d78f7" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: -195461120 Connection: close Content-Type: application/octet-stream This is a bug in Apache. bye, //mirabilos -- [...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be- ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
