On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 06:53:27 +0900 Henry Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 03:01:07PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
[...] > > > > -- me, March 1999 > > > > Now I must know this: is the "me" == HN? > > Yes. Next year it will be ten years. How things have changed in those > years! Because of the capabilities of present day computers, Lynx > no longer is essential to daily life. Both cpu cycles and memory size > have increased close to 1000-fold from when I first started using Lynx. > Graphic browsers have matured, too. So have OSs. I mean, why use Lynx > for graphic content when Adobe Reader and OpenOffice are out there? Please. Xpdf or Evince. I don't need a 116 MB viewer package, when that viewer is only good for viewing *one* type of file. [Could mention Abiword too, but if you prefer OpenOffice, you prefer OpenOffice. No problem.] > (BTW, MSIE, at least, uses these in exactly the same way Lynx executes > its DOWNLOADER.) Well it's a very simple, sensible way to deal with file-types the browser itself can't display... which makes this very surprising, since you're talking about a Microsoft program. > > __Henry Patrick. -- Yow! Am I having fun yet? _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
